Screener
CCOR vs FDG
Core Alternative ETF vs American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
Key differences
- FDG costs 0.84% less per year.
- FDG is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOR is classified as alternative, while FDG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; FDG uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FDG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | FDG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | $387M |
| Since | 2017 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.9% | +35.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.3% | +13.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.56 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.92% | 17.88% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -43.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCOR and FDG
Explore further