Screener
CCOR vs GPZ
Core Alternative ETF vs VanEck Alternative Asset Manager ETF
Key differences
- GPZ costs 0.89% less per year.
- GPZ is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOR is classified as alternative, while GPZ is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; GPZ uses index tracking.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | GPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | $245M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -5.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.56 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.92% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -31.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCOR and GPZ
Explore further