Screener
CCOR vs IWMI
Core Alternative ETF vs NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF
Key differences
Both CCOR and IWMI are alternative ETFs. CCOR charges 1.29% a year and IWMI 0.68%. The main difference: IWMI costs 0.61% less per year.
- IWMI costs 0.61% less per year.
- IWMI is much larger than CCOR. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | IWMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $27M | $909M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | 1.71% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -3.9% | +30.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | -1.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.46 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.21% | 15.15% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -23.88% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.