Screener
CCOR vs IXUS
Core Alternative ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
Key differences
- IXUS costs 1.22% less per year.
- IXUS is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOR is classified as alternative, while IXUS is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- CCOR covers north america markets; IXUS covers global ex us.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; IXUS uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IXUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXUS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | IXUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | $56.2B |
| Since | 2017 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 2.94% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global ex us |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.9% | +30.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | +18.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.3% | +8.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.56 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.92% | 15.28% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -36.22% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCOR and IXUS
Explore further