Screener
CCOR vs MAGO
Core Alternative ETF vs Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF
Key differences
Both CCOR and MAGO are alternative ETFs. CCOR charges 1.29% a year and MAGO 0.99%. The main difference: MAGO costs 0.30% less per year.
- MAGO costs 0.30% less per year.
- CCOR is much larger than MAGO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | MAGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $27M | $2M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | -3.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | -1.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.46 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.22% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -17.98% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.