Screener
CCOR vs NBFR
Core Alternative ETF vs Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed 10 Buffer ETF
Key differences
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; NBFR uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | NBFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | — |
| Since | 2017 | — |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | -5.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.56 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.92% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -5.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCOR and NBFR
Explore further