Screener
CCOR vs PSTR
Core Alternative ETF vs PeakShares Sector Rotation ETF
Key differences
- PSTR costs 0.22% less per year.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; PSTR uses tactical allocation.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | PSTR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 1.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | $57M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | 4.75% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.9% | +19.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.56 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.92% | 8.43% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -14.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CCOR and PSTR
Explore further