Screener
CCOR vs SFTX
Core Alternative ETF vs Horizon International Managed Risk ETF
Key differences
- SFTX costs 0.47% less per year.
- SFTX is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CCOR is classified as alternative, while SFTX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- CCOR covers north america markets; SFTX covers global.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; SFTX uses active selection.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | SFTX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 0.82% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $28M | $412M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.08% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.56 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.87% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -12.75% |
Similar to CCOR and SFTX
Explore further