Screener
CCOR vs ZHOG
Core Alternative ETF vs F/m Opportunistic Income ETF
Key differences
CCOR is an alternative ETF, while ZHOG is a fixed income ETF. CCOR charges 1.29% a year and ZHOG 0.43%.
- CCOR is an alternative fund, while ZHOG is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- CCOR follows a option income strategy; ZHOG uses active selection.
- ZHOG costs 0.86% less per year.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CCOR | ZHOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.29% | 0.43% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $27M | $46M |
| Since | 2017 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | 5.61% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | -3.9% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | -1.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -2.1% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.46 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.21% | 1.58% |
| Max drawdown | -22.99% | -3.66% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.