Screener
CDL vs GRIN
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Div Volatility Wtd ETF vs VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow Growth ETF
Key differences
- CDL costs 0.21% less per year.
- CDL covers north america markets; GRIN covers global.
- CDL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CDL | GRIN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.56% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $388M | $261M |
| Since | 2015 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.07% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.82% | — |
| Max drawdown | -41.03% | -14.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CDL and GRIN
Explore further