Screener
CDX vs HYDB
Simplify High Yield ETF vs iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
Key differences
- CDX costs 0.10% less per year.
- HYDB is significantly larger than CDX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CDX is classified as alternative, while HYDB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- CDX follows a multi strategy strategy; HYDB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, HYDB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- HYDB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CDX | HYDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $440M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2022 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 8.37% | 7.11% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.3% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.8% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.42 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.69% | 3.82% |
| Max drawdown | -13.24% | -21.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CDX and HYDB
Explore further