Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

CEMB vs BREM

iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF vs iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF

CEMB

iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.50%

Fund size

$388M

BREM

iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.50%

Fund size

$38M

Key differences

  • CEMB is significantly larger than BREM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • CEMB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

CEMBBREM
Annual cost (TER)0.50%0.50%
Fund size (AUM)$388M$38M
Since20122025
Dividend yield5.15%
Asset classfixed incomefixed income
Regionemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+7.6%N/A
CAGR 3Y+7.1%N/A
CAGR 5Y+2.0%N/A
Sharpe 3Y0.82N/A
Volatility 1Y3.10%
Max drawdown-20.84%-4.54%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to CEMB and BREM