Screener
CEMB vs SLQD
iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF vs iShares 0-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- SLQD costs 0.44% less per year.
- SLQD is significantly larger than CEMB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, CEMB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CEMB | SLQD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $388M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2012 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 5.15% | 4.25% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +7.6% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.1% | +5.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.0% | +2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.10% | 1.49% |
| Max drawdown | -20.84% | -12.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CEMB and SLQD
Explore further