Screener
CFA vs CDC
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF vs VictoryShares US EQ Income Enhanced Volatility Wtd ETF
Key differences
- Over the last 3 years, CFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CFA | CDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $532M | $737M |
| Since | 2014 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.25% | 3.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.2% | +22.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.0% | +12.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | 0.77 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.91% | 9.85% |
| Max drawdown | -37.74% | -21.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CFA and CDC
Explore further