Screener
CFA vs SPLV
VictoryShares US 500 Volatility Wtd ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
Key differences
- SPLV costs 0.10% less per year.
- SPLV is significantly larger than CFA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, CFA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CFA | SPLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $532M | $7.2B |
| Since | 2014 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.25% | 2.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.2% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.0% | +8.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.8% | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.91% | 9.71% |
| Max drawdown | -37.74% | -36.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CFA and SPLV
Explore further