Screener
CFIT vs FBND
Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF vs Fidelity Total Bond ETF
Key differences
- FBND costs 0.14% less per year.
- FBND is significantly larger than CFIT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CFIT covers north america markets; FBND covers global.
- CFIT follows a active selection strategy; FBND uses index tracking.
- FBND has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CFIT | FBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21M | $25.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 4.18% | 4.70% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.1% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.48% | 3.90% |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -17.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CFIT and FBND
Explore further