Screener
CFIT vs IGEB
Cambria Fixed Income Trend ETF vs iShares Investment Grade Systematic Bond ETF
Key differences
- IGEB costs 0.32% less per year.
- IGEB is significantly larger than CFIT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CFIT follows a active selection strategy; IGEB uses index tracking.
- IGEB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CFIT | IGEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 4.18% | 5.03% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.5% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 5.49% | 4.23% |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -21.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CFIT and IGEB
Explore further