Screener
CGBL vs AMAX
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF vs Adaptive Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
Key differences
- CGBL costs 1.03% less per year.
- CGBL is significantly larger than AMAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGBL is classified as mixed asset, while AMAX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CGBL follows a active selection strategy; AMAX uses option income.
- AMAX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGBL | AMAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 1.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.1B | $60M |
| Since | 2023 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.92% | 10.63% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.6% | +11.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.65% | 9.98% |
| Max drawdown | -11.66% | -16.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGBL and AMAX
Explore further