Screener
CGBL vs KAT
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF vs Scharf ETF
Key differences
- CGBL costs 0.42% less per year.
- CGBL is significantly larger than KAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGBL is classified as mixed asset, while KAT is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGBL | KAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.1B | $688M |
| Since | 2023 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 1.92% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.65% | — |
| Max drawdown | -11.66% | -9.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGBL and KAT
Explore further