Screener
CGBL vs MANI
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF vs Man Active Income ETF
Key differences
- CGBL is classified as mixed asset, while MANI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CGBL follows a active selection strategy; MANI uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGBL | MANI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.1B | — |
| Since | 2023 | — |
| Dividend yield | 1.92% | — |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.65% | — |
| Max drawdown | -11.66% | -0.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGBL and MANI
Explore further