Screener
CGCB vs BFIX
Capital Group Core Bond ETF vs Build Bond Innovation ETF
Key differences
- CGCB costs 0.18% less per year.
- CGCB is significantly larger than BFIX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGCB is classified as fixed income, while BFIX is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- CGCB follows a active selection strategy; BFIX uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGCB | BFIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.27% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.8B | $13M |
| Since | 2023 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 4.23% | 3.60% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.6% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.99% | 2.91% |
| Max drawdown | -5.16% | -8.03% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGCB and BFIX
Explore further