Screener
CGCP vs BKAG
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF vs BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- BKAG costs 0.34% less per year.
- CGCP is significantly larger than BKAG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGCP covers global markets; BKAG covers north america.
- CGCP follows a active selection strategy; BKAG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CGCP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGCP | BKAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.6B | $2.1B |
| Since | 2022 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 5.14% | 4.27% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.6% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.1% | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.29 | 0.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.74% | 3.91% |
| Max drawdown | -15.07% | -18.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGCP and BKAG
Explore further