Screener
CGCV vs BASG
Capital Group Conservative Equity ETF vs Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF
Key differences
- CGCV costs 0.28% less per year.
- CGCV is significantly larger than BASG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGCV covers north america markets; BASG covers global.
- CGCV follows a index tracking strategy; BASG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGCV | BASG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 0.61% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.6B | $467M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.49% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.81% | — |
| Max drawdown | -13.13% | -19.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGCV and BASG
Explore further