Screener
CGDG vs EMDV
Capital Group Dividend Growers ETF vs ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF
Key differences
- CGDG costs 0.13% less per year.
- CGDG is significantly larger than EMDV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGDG covers global markets; EMDV covers emerging markets.
- CGDG follows a active selection strategy; EMDV uses index tracking.
- EMDV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGDG | EMDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4.9B | $7M |
| Since | 2023 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 2.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.8% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.69% | 11.05% |
| Max drawdown | -10.52% | -39.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGDG and EMDV
Explore further