Screener
CGDV vs DVYA
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF vs iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
Key differences
- CGDV costs 0.16% less per year.
- CGDV is significantly larger than DVYA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGDV follows a active selection strategy; DVYA uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CGDV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DVYA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGDV | DVYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $33.0B | $70M |
| Since | 2022 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 4.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.0% | +41.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.7% | +21.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.49 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.75% | 13.00% |
| Max drawdown | -21.81% | -45.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGDV and DVYA
Explore further