Screener
CGDV vs FVAL
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF vs Fidelity Value Factor ETF
Key differences
- FVAL costs 0.18% less per year.
- CGDV is significantly larger than FVAL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGDV follows a active selection strategy; FVAL uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CGDV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FVAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGDV | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $33.0B | $1.2B |
| Since | 2022 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 1.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.0% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.7% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.49 | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.75% | 11.74% |
| Max drawdown | -21.81% | -37.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGDV and FVAL
Explore further