Screener
CGDV vs SPDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF vs AAM S&P 500 High Dividend Value ETF
Key differences
- CGDV is significantly larger than SPDV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGDV follows a active selection strategy; SPDV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CGDV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPDV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGDV | SPDV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $33.0B | $90M |
| Since | 2022 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.23% | 3.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.0% | +28.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.7% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.49 | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.75% | 12.32% |
| Max drawdown | -21.81% | -43.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGDV and SPDV
Explore further