Screener
CGGE vs RIFR
Capital Group Global Equity ETF vs Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- CGGE costs 0.12% less per year.
- CGGE is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGGE follows a index tracking strategy; RIFR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGGE | RIFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $42M |
| Since | 2024 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.0% | +16.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.84% | 10.46% |
| Max drawdown | -14.44% | -6.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGGE and RIFR
Explore further