Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

CGGG vs GSLC

Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

CGGG

Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF

Capital Group

Annual cost

0.39%

Fund size

$78M

GSLC

Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF

Goldman Sachs

Annual cost

0.09%

Fund size

$15.0B

Key differences

  • GSLC costs 0.30% less per year.
  • GSLC is significantly larger than CGGG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • CGGG follows a index tracking strategy; GSLC uses index enhanced.
  • GSLC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

CGGGGSLC
Annual cost (TER)0.39%0.09%
Fund size (AUM)$78M$15.0B
Since20252015
Dividend yield0.97%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex enhanced
CAGR 1YN/A+24.6%
CAGR 3YN/A+21.4%
CAGR 5YN/A+12.9%
Sharpe 3YN/A1.15
Volatility 1Y11.86%
Max drawdown-17.74%-33.69%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to CGGG and GSLC