Screener
CGGG vs GUSE
Capital Group U.S. Large Growth ETF vs Goldman Sachs Enhanced U.S. Equity ETF
Key differences
- GUSE costs 0.09% less per year.
- GUSE is significantly larger than CGGG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGGG follows a index tracking strategy; GUSE uses active selection.
- GUSE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGGG | GUSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $341M |
| Since | 2025 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.65% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -17.74% | -8.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGGG and GUSE
Explore further