Screener
CGGO vs BKCH
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF vs Global X Blockchain ETF
Key differences
- CGGO is significantly larger than BKCH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGGO covers global markets; BKCH covers north america.
- CGGO follows a active selection strategy; BKCH uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BKCH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGGO | BKCH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.1B | $314M |
| Since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.3% | +108.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | +61.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.82% | 70.40% |
| Max drawdown | -24.90% | -91.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGGO and BKCH
Explore further