Screener
CGGO vs EMM
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF vs Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- CGGO costs 0.19% less per year.
- CGGO is significantly larger than EMM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGGO covers global markets; EMM covers emerging markets.
- EMM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGGO | EMM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.1B | $58M |
| Since | 2022 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 0.76% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.3% | +60.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.82% | 21.58% |
| Max drawdown | -24.90% | -21.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGGO and EMM
Explore further