Screener
CGGO vs EPEM
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF vs Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGGO costs 0.37% less per year.
- CGGO is significantly larger than EPEM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGGO covers global markets; EPEM covers emerging markets.
- CGGO follows a active selection strategy; EPEM uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGGO | EPEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.84% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.1B | $8M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.82% | — |
| Max drawdown | -24.90% | -13.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGGO and EPEM
Explore further