Screener
CGGO vs EPP
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF vs iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF
Key differences
Both CGGO and EPP are equity ETFs. CGGO charges 0.47% a year and EPP 0.47%. The main difference: CGGO follows a active selection strategy; EPP uses index tracking.
- CGGO follows a active selection strategy; EPP uses index tracking.
- CGGO covers global markets; EPP covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- CGGO is much larger than EPP. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, CGGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EPP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGGO | EPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11.3B | $2.1B |
| Since | 2022 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.71% | 3.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | asia pacific |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.6% | +12.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.5% | +13.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.60 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.47% | 14.91% |
| Max drawdown | -24.90% | -39.30% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.