Screener
CGGO vs GKAT
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF vs Scharf Global Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- CGGO costs 0.12% less per year.
- CGGO is significantly larger than GKAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGGO | GKAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.1B | $158M |
| Since | 2022 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 0.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.59% | — |
| Max drawdown | -24.90% | -10.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGGO and GKAT
Explore further