Screener
CGGO vs IGF
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IGF costs 0.08% less per year.
- CGGO follows a active selection strategy; IGF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CGGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGGO | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.1B | $10.7B |
| Since | 2022 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.9% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.3% | +15.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.99 | 0.93 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.59% | 10.43% |
| Max drawdown | -24.90% | -42.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGGO and IGF
Explore further