Screener
CGGO vs SCHF
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF vs Schwab International Equity ETF
Key differences
- SCHF costs 0.44% less per year.
- SCHF is significantly larger than CGGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGGO covers global markets; SCHF covers global ex us.
- CGGO follows a active selection strategy; SCHF uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CGGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCHF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGGO | SCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.1B | $63.0B |
| Since | 2022 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 3.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.3% | +33.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.4% | +19.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.82% | 15.83% |
| Max drawdown | -24.90% | -34.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGGO and SCHF
Explore further