Screener
CGGR vs EMES
Capital Group Growth ETF vs Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF
Key differences
- CGGR costs 0.26% less per year.
- CGGR is significantly larger than EMES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGGR follows a active selection strategy; EMES uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGGR | EMES | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22.2B | $11M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.10% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.1% | +43.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.35% | 20.75% |
| Max drawdown | -28.90% | -12.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGGR and EMES
Explore further