Screener
CGGR vs IWO
Capital Group Growth ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 Growth ETF
Key differences
Both CGGR and IWO are equity ETFs. CGGR charges 0.39% a year and IWO 0.24%. The main difference: CGGR follows a active selection strategy; IWO uses index tracking.
- CGGR follows a active selection strategy; IWO uses index tracking.
- CGGR covers global markets; IWO covers North America.
- IWO costs 0.15% less per year.
- Over the last three years, CGGR has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGGR | IWO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $24.6B | $14.7B |
| Since | 2022 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.09% | 0.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.7% | +35.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.6% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.05 | 0.66 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.12% | 22.08% |
| Max drawdown | -28.90% | -42.01% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.