Screener
CGHM vs TAXF
Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF vs American Century Diversified Municipal Bond ETF
Key differences
- TAXF costs 0.07% less per year.
- CGHM is significantly larger than TAXF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGHM follows a index tracking strategy; TAXF uses active selection.
- TAXF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGHM | TAXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $627M |
| Since | 2024 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 3.80% | 3.82% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +8.0% | +7.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.11% | 3.09% |
| Max drawdown | -5.90% | -13.94% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGHM and TAXF
Explore further