Screener
CGHY vs BKAG
Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF vs BNY Mellon Core Bond ETF
Key differences
- BKAG costs 0.39% less per year.
- BKAG is significantly larger than CGHY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGHY covers global markets; BKAG covers north america.
- BKAG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGHY | BKAG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $94M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.27% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.91% |
| Max drawdown | -2.38% | -18.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGHY and BKAG
Explore further