Screener
CGHY vs VNLA
Capital Group High Yield Bond ETF vs Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF
Key differences
Both CGHY and VNLA are fixed income ETFs. CGHY charges 0.39% a year and VNLA 0.23%. The main difference: CGHY follows a index tracking strategy; VNLA uses active selection.
- CGHY follows a index tracking strategy; VNLA uses active selection.
- VNLA costs 0.16% less per year.
- VNLA is much larger than CGHY. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- VNLA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGHY | VNLA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.23% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $94M | $3.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.21% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +4.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 2.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 0.63% |
| Max drawdown | -2.38% | -4.49% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.