Screener
CGIC vs EFAD
Capital Group International Core Equity ETF vs ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF
Key differences
- CGIC is significantly larger than EFAD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGIC follows a active selection strategy; EFAD uses index tracking.
- EFAD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGIC | EFAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $62M |
| Since | 2024 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 1.38% | 2.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.4% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.96% | 13.36% |
| Max drawdown | -13.10% | -35.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGIC and EFAD
Explore further