Screener
CGSD vs SBND
Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF vs Columbia Short Duration Bond ETF
Key differences
- CGSD is significantly larger than SBND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGSD follows a active selection strategy; SBND uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGSD | SBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.2B | $202M |
| Since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 4.48% | 4.54% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.4% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +5.0% | +5.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.70 | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.46% | 2.50% |
| Max drawdown | -1.75% | -10.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGSD and SBND
Explore further