Screener
CGSM vs PULS
Capital Group Short Duration Municipal Income ETF vs PGIM Ultra Short Bond ETF
Key differences
- PULS costs 0.10% less per year.
- PULS is significantly larger than CGSM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGSM follows a index tracking strategy; PULS uses active selection.
- PULS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGSM | PULS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.1B | $15.7B |
| Since | 2023 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 3.04% | 5.02% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.6% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 3.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.33% | 0.42% |
| Max drawdown | -1.42% | -5.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGSM and PULS
Explore further