Screener
CGUI vs CGBL
Capital Group Ultra Short Income ETF vs Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Key differences
- CGUI costs 0.15% less per year.
- CGBL is significantly larger than CGUI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGUI is classified as fixed income, while CGBL is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- CGUI follows a index tracking strategy; CGBL uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGUI | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.18% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $246M | $6.1B |
| Since | 2024 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.95% | 1.92% |
| Asset class | fixed income | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.5% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.74% | 9.69% |
| Max drawdown | -0.18% | -11.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGUI and CGBL
Explore further