Screener
CGUS vs BKMC
Capital Group Core Equity ETF vs BNY Mellon US Mid Cap Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- BKMC costs 0.29% less per year.
- CGUS is significantly larger than BKMC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGUS follows a active selection strategy; BKMC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CGUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGUS | BKMC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.3B | $621M |
| Since | 2022 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 1.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.8% | +23.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.0% | +16.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.27 | 0.75 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.50% | 15.21% |
| Max drawdown | -22.15% | -25.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGUS and BKMC
Explore further