Screener
CGUS vs INEQ
Capital Group Core Equity ETF vs Columbia International Equity Income ETF
Key differences
- CGUS costs 0.12% less per year.
- CGUS is significantly larger than INEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGUS covers north america markets; INEQ covers global.
- CGUS follows a active selection strategy; INEQ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, CGUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- INEQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGUS | INEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 0.45% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.3B | $80M |
| Since | 2022 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 2.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.2% | +29.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | +20.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.48% | 13.63% |
| Max drawdown | -22.15% | -40.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGUS and INEQ
Explore further