Screener
CGUS vs OASC
Capital Group Core Equity ETF vs OneAscent Enhanced Small and Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- CGUS costs 0.36% less per year.
- CGUS is significantly larger than OASC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGUS follows a active selection strategy; OASC uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGUS | OASC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.3B | $78M |
| Since | 2022 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | 0.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.2% | +39.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.48% | 18.21% |
| Max drawdown | -22.15% | -26.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGUS and OASC
Explore further