Screener
CGUS vs TACN
Capital Group Core Equity ETF vs T. Rowe Price Active Core International Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGUS covers north america markets; TACN covers europe.
- CGUS follows a active selection strategy; TACN uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| CGUS | TACN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.33% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $10.3B | — |
| Since | 2022 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.90% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | europe |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.27 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.50% | — |
| Max drawdown | -22.15% | -10.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to CGUS and TACN
Explore further